This paper attempts to offer a realistic and viable statistical procedure (paired comparisons or PC method) of identifying potential learning disabilities via the ITPA battery. Such a procedure is predicated on a variation of R.A. Fisher's least-significant difference method, which employs multiple pairwise comparisons, and the PC method attempts to be more sensitive than the methodology proposed by Kirk and Elkins, which employs the absolute average deviation as the critical parameter. Essentially, the PC method used a probabilistic model to ascertain learning discrepancies.
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 2 citations exist upstream.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.