References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

• 2013How should we teach tree-thinking? An experimental test of two hypotheses43 cited
• 2009Acceptance of Evolution Increases with Student Academic Level: A Comparison Between a Secular and a Religious College36 cited
• 2008Assessment of Biology Majors’ Versus Nonmajors’ Views on Evolution, Creationism, and Intelligent Design31 cited
• 2009Transforming Our Thinking about Transitional Forms24 cited
• 2010New England Faculty and College Students Differ in Their Views About Evolution, Creationism, Intelligent Design, and Religiosity22 cited
• 2007Fact, theory, test and evolution22 cited
• 2010Evidence for Evolution Versus Evidence for Intelligent Design: Parallel Confusions21 cited
• 2009Don’t Call it “Darwinism”20 cited
• 2007The critique of intelligent design: Epicurus, Marx, Darwin, and Freud and the materialist defense of science16 cited
• 2008Teachers Who Won't, Don't, or Can't Teach Evolution Properly: A Burning Issue13 cited
• 2009Darwin's explanation of design: From natural theology to natural selection11 cited
• 2012Educators of Prospective Teachers Hesitate to Embrace Evolution Due to Deficient Understanding of Science/Evolution and High Religiosity11 cited
• 2017A state-by-state comparison of middle school science standards on evolution in the United States10 cited