SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Editorial: Standards of Reporting: The CONSORT, QUORUM, and STROBE Guidelines
16 references·4 citing·32 second hop
Editorial: Standards of Reporting: The CONSORT, QUORUM, and STROBE Guidelines (2009)Editorial: Standards of Reporting: The CO…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…How to Write a Systematic Review (2007)How to Write a Systematic Rev…Requisitos uniformes para manuscritos submetidos a periódicos biomédicos: escrevendo e editando para publicações biomédicas (2006)Requisitos uniformes para man…INTRODUCING LEVELS OF EVIDENCE TO THE JOURNAL (2003)INTRODUCING LEVELS OF EVIDENC…The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revise…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Meta-Analyses in Orthopaedic Surgery (2001)Meta-Analyses in Orthopaedic …Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis (2001)Investigating and dealing wit…Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Meta-analysis of Observationa…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement (1996)Better reporting of randomise…International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (1990)International Committee of Me…What Are the Levels of Evidence on Which We Base Decisions for Surgical Management of Lower Extremity Bone Tumors? (2013)What Are the Levels of Eviden…Writing Abstracts and Developing Posters for National Meetings (2011)Writing Abstracts and Develop…Reporting experiments in homeopathic basic research (REHBaR) – A detailed guideline for authors (2009)Reporting experiments in home…Clinimetrics Corner: Publishing a Scientific Manuscript on Manual Therapy (2009)Clinimetrics Corner: Publishi…Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND Statement (2004)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)A modified test for small‐study effects in meta‐analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints (2005)The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed (2005)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)Prevalence of mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Fundamental Movement Skills in Children and Adolescents (2010)The Role of Behavioral Science Theory in Development and Implementation of Public Health Interventions (2010)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force (2013)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies22,917 cited
  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies21,132 cited
  • 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials2,754 cited
  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies2,698 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials2,545 cited
  • 2001Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis2,229 cited
  • 2003INTRODUCING LEVELS OF EVIDENCE TO THE JOURNAL1,298 cited
  • 1996Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement610 cited
  • 2007How to Write a Systematic Review

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

606 cited
  • 2006Requisitos uniformes para manuscritos submetidos a periódicos biomédicos: escrevendo e editando para publicações biomédicas416 cited
  • 1990International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.415 cited
  • 2001Meta-Analyses in Orthopaedic Surgery190 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2009Reporting experiments in homeopathic basic research (REHBaR) – A detailed guideline for authors43 cited
    • 2011Writing Abstracts and Developing Posters for National Meetings30 cited
    • 2013What Are the Levels of Evidence on Which We Base Decisions for Surgical Management of Lower Extremity Bone Tumors?26 cited
    • 2009Clinimetrics Corner: Publishing a Scientific Manuscript on Manual Therapy12 cited