A conceptual critique of the EA:es comparison in the Comprehensive Rorschach System.

James H. Kleiger

21 citations0/0 files storedPsychological Assessment

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychological Testing and Assessment Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Personality Traits and Psychology

Abstract

Despite its empirical and normative strengths, the underlying conceptual base of the Comprehensive Rorschach System at times lacks clarity and an overarching theory of personality that can help psychodiagnosticians make more clinically relevant inferences. After reviewing the functions provided by an integral theory of personality, the author focuses on the EA:es index as a way of demonstrating how mechanistic jargon and lack of a guiding theory and conceptual clarity can lead to misleading and contradictory inferences. Case examples are provided, and some of the empirical foundations of the EA:es index are reviewed

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 21 citations exist upstream.

References

2013Stress: Appraisal and Coping 1991Emotion And Adaptation 1988Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed. rev.) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed. rev.) American Psychiatric Association (1987). American Psychiatric Press, Inc., 1400 K Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005. 567 pp., $39.95 hardcover; $29.95 softcover.2018The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment 1984How Does Analysis Cure?1970The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language 1967The Conduct of Inquiry 2013Advances in Personality Assessment

Cited by

2002Elaboration of Some Sequence Analysis Strategies: Examples and Guidelines for Level of Confidence 2007FAILING THE BURDEN OF PROOF: THE SCIENCE AND ETHICS OF PROJECTIVE TESTS IN CUSTODY EVALUATIONS 2015The “Feeling of Movement”: Notes on the Rorschach Human Movement Response 1999RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE RORSCHACH AND THE NEO-FIVE FACTOR INVENTORY 2004Differences in Comprehensive System Rorschach Variables Between Groups Differing in Therapy Suitability

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.