Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Predatory Publishing, Questionable Peer Review, and Fraudulent Conferences

10 references·16 citing·36 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2012Predatory publishers are corrupting open access956 cited
2013Who's Afraid of Peer Review?934 cited
2011The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009753 cited
2013Open access: The true cost of science publishing524 cited
2012Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact479 cited
2013Who's Afraid of Peer Review?300 cited
2013The G oogle scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators271 cited
2001Reasons Reviewers Reject and Accept Manuscripts235 cited
2006Best Practice Guidelines on Publication Ethics: a Publisher's Perspective231 cited
1998Who Reviews the Reviewers? Feasibility of Using a Fictitious Manuscript to Evaluate Peer Reviewer Performance141 cited

Cited by

2016The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review182 cited
2017The extent of South African authored articles in predatory journals111 cited
2016The Pressure to Publish More and the Scope of Predatory Publishing Activities94 cited
2017Is Predatory Publishing a Real Threat? Evidence from a Large Database Study87 cited
2015

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Making Open Access work

79 cited

2016Hijacked journals, hijacked web-sites, journal phishing, misleading metrics, and predatory publishing: actual and potential threats to academic integrity and publishing ethics77 cited

2016The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review58 cited

2021Decentralizing science: Towards an interoperable open peer review ecosystem using blockchain56 cited

2018Fragments of peer review: A quantitative analysis of the literature (1969-2015)55 cited

2017Invitations received from potential predatory publishers and fraudulent conferences: a 12-month early-career researcher experience53 cited

2019The "Dark Side" of Academics? Emerging Issues in the Gaming and Manipulation of Metrics in Higher Education53 cited

2021Efficiency of “Publish or Perish” Policy—Some Considerations Based on the Uzbekistan Experience41 cited

2020Academic E-Mail Overload and the Burden of “Academic Spam”37 cited

2019The storm around Beall’s List: a review of issues raised by Beall’s critics over his criteria of identifying predatory journals and publishers36 cited

2017Beware of the predatory science journal: A potential threat to the integrity of medical research33 cited

2018Predatory publishing and cybercrime targeting academics33 cited