SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reporting quality of conference abstracts on randomised controlled trials in gerontology and geriatrics: a cross-sectional investigation
10 references·1 citing·45 second hop
Reporting quality of conference abstracts on randomised controlled trials in gerontology and geriatrics: a cross-sectional investigation (2010)Reporting quality of conference abstracts…The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed (2010)The quality of reports of ran…The new CONSORT statement (2010)The new CONSORT statementGuidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)Guidance for Developers of He…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)CONSORT for Reporting Randomi…Quality of reporting of randomized clinical trials in abstracts of the 2005 annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology. (2007)Quality of reporting of rando…Reporting of trials presented in conference abstracts needs to be improved (2006)Reporting of trials presented…Abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology conference: how completely are trials reported? (2005)Abstracts presented at the Am…The reporting quality of abstracts of randomised controlled trials submitted to the ICS meeting in Heidelberg (2004)The reporting quality of abst…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Reporting quality of abstracts in phase III clinical trials of systemic therapy in metastatic solid malignancies (2015)Reporting quality of abstract…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2008)Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts (2013)The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development (2013)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Do Journals Publishing in the Field of Urology Endorse Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of Author Instructions (2011)Reporting of eligibility criteria of randomised trials: cohort study comparing trial protocols with subsequent articles (2011)Study-design selection criteria in systematic reviews of effectiveness of health systems interventions and reforms: A meta-review (2012)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)CONSORT 2010 Statement (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. (2010)Effect of Preventive Interventions in Mentally Ill Parents on the Mental Health of the Offspring: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2011)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)More Informative Abstracts Revisited (1990)Publication and Related Biases (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Better reporting of randomized trials in biomedical journal and conference abstracts (2007)The quality of reporting and publication status of vaccines trials presented at veterinary conferences from 1988 to 2003 (2010)Reporting Quality of Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Dental Specialty Journals (2013)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement (2013)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force (2013)A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) (2021)Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)Has the quality of abstracts for randomised controlled trials improved since the release of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trial guideline for abstract reporting? A survey of four high-profile anaesthesia journals (2010)A scoping review of comparisons between abstracts and full reports in primary biomedical research (2017)Preferred reporting items for journal and conference abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA for Abstracts): checklist, explanation, and elaboration (2021)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Quality of reporting in sports injury prevention abstracts according to the CONSORT and STROBE criteria: an analysis of the World Congress of Sports Injury Prevention in 2005 and 2008 (2009)Randomized Clinical Trials Presented at the World Congress of Endourology: How Is the Quality of Reporting? (2010)Reporting quality of randomized-controlled trials in multiple sclerosis from 2000 to 2015, based on CONSORT statement (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 2010Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines1,432 cited
  • 2008CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration670 cited
  • 2010The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed503 cited
  • 2006Reporting of trials presented in conference abstracts needs to be improved98 cited
  • 2010The new CONSORT statement86 cited
  • 2005Abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology conference: how completely are trials reported?49 cited
  • 2007Quality of reporting of randomized clinical trials in abstracts of the 2005 annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology.24 cited
  • 2004The reporting quality of abstracts of randomised controlled trials submitted to the ICS meeting in Heidelberg18 cited

Cited by

  • 2015Reporting quality of abstracts in phase III clinical trials of systemic therapy in metastatic solid malignancies13 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work