Promoting Public Service Integrity: A Case for Responsible Accountability

Abstract

We discuss below difference between the concepts of accountability and responsibility, in the context of government administration. We argue that New Zealand’s public sector reforms, in particular, have depended on an essentially mechanistic as distinct from an organic interpretation of public organisations. A mechanistic approach focuses disproportionately on notions of organisational accountability at the expense of responsibility, and as a consequence may prove counterproductive over the longer term in maintaining high standards of ethical probity. A concept of responsible accountability needs to be developed further as a means of countering this possibility. We speculate on whether the emphasis on contractualism has enhanced or undermined an integrity‐based as opposed to a compliance‐based ethics regime, and the possible implications of this for the maintenance of ethical standards.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 41 citations exist upstream.