SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Bibliometric rankings of journals based on Impact Factors: An axiomatic approach
16 references·16 citing·29 second hopsampled
Bibliometric rankings of journals based on Impact Factors: An axiomatic approach (2010)Bibliometric rankings of journals based o…Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)Theory and practise of the g-…The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The History and Meaning of th…Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences? (2005)Impact of bibliometrics upon …An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)An index to quantify an indiv…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Why the impact factor of jour…The skewness of science (1992)The skewness of scienceStochastic Dominance and Expected Utility: Survey and Analysis (1992)Stochastic Dominance and Expe…Foundations of Measurement (1990)Foundations of MeasurementIs citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? (1979)Is citation analysis a legiti…Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large (1976)Risk Aversion in the Small an…Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Citation Analysis as a Tool i…Utility Theory for Decision Making (1971)Utility Theory for Decision M…Foundations of Measurement, Vol. I: Additive and Polynomial Representations (1971)Foundations of Measurement, V…The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)The Matthew effect in science…The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew Effect in ScienceRisk Aversion in the Small and in the Large (1964)Risk Aversion in the Small an…Exploring the Major Trends and Emerging Themes of Artificial Intelligence in the Scientific Leading Journals amidst the COVID-19 Era (2023)Exploring the Major Trends an…Intellectual Structure and Evolution of Accounting Conservatism Research: Past Trends and Future Research Suggestions (2021)Intellectual Structure and Ev…A data science-based framework to categorize academic journals (2019)A data science-based framewor…Active Ageing: Mapping of Scientific Coverage (2018)Active Ageing: Mapping of Sci…Ranking authors using fractional counting of citations: An axiomatic approach (2016)Ranking authors using fractio…Expected number of citations and the crown indicator (2015)Expected number of citations …An axiomatic approach to bibliometric rankings and indices (2014)An axiomatic approach to bibl…Year-based h-type indicators (2013)Year-based h-type indicatorsThe h-bubble (2013)The h-bubbleThe journal impact factor: angel, devil, or scapegoat? A comment on J.K. Vanclay’s article 2011 (2012)The journal impact factor: an…The end of the “European Paradox” (2012)The end of the “European Para…The Citation Merit of Scientific Publications (2012)The Citation Merit of Scienti…Quantifying the degree of research collaboration: A comparative study of collaborative measures (2011)Quantifying the degree of res…Comparing impact factors from two different citation databases: The case of Computer Science (2011)Comparing impact factors from…Basic properties of both percentile rank scores and the I3 indicator (2011)Basic properties of both perc…Consistent bibliometric rankings of authors and of journals (2010)Consistent bibliometric ranki…Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science (1957)Resistance by Scientists to Scientific Discovery (1961)The Scientific Community. (1966)Matthew Effects in Reading: Some Consequences of Individual Differences in the Acquisition of Literacy (1986)Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law (2005)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases (2013)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers (1990)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Little Science, Big Science (1963)The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice (1981)Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior (1989)Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review (2002)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review (2020)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)Financial Intermediation and Delegated Monitoring (1984)Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk (1988)Well-being : the foundations of hedonic psychology (1999)On the measurement of inequality (1970)THE VALUATION OF RISK ASSETS AND THE SELECTION OF RISKY INVESTMENTS IN STOCK PORTFOLIOS AND CAPITAL BUDGETS**This paper is another in a series of interrelated theoretical and statistical studies of corporate financial and investment policies being made under grants from the Rockefeller Foundation, and more recently the Ford Foundation, to the Harvard Business School. The generous support for this work is most gratefully acknowledged. The author is also much indebted to his colleagues Professors Bishop, Christenson, Kahr, Raiffa, and (especially) Schlaifer, for extensive discussion and commentary on an earlier draft of this paper; but responsibility for any errors or imperfections remains strictly his own.[Professor Sharpe's paper, “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk” (Journal of Finance, September 1964) appeared after this paper was in final form and on its way to the printers. My first section, which parallels the first half of his paper (with corresponding conclusions), sets the algebraic framework for sections II, III and VI, (which have no counterpart in his paper) and for section IV on the equilibrium prices of risk assets, concerning which our results differ significantly for reasons which will be explored elsewhere. Sharpe does not take up the capital budgeting problem developed in section V below.] (1975)The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing (1976)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
  • 1968The Matthew Effect in Science6,700 cited
  • 1964Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large4,964 cited
  • 1968The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered.4,791 cited
  • 1976Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large4,655 cited
  • 1972Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation2,781 cited
  • 2006The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor2,765 cited
  • 1971Utility Theory for Decision Making2,460 cited
  • 1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research2,444 cited
  • 2006Theory and practise of the g-index2,347 cited
  • 1990Foundations of Measurement1,953 cited
  • 1979Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool?908 cited
  • 1992Stochastic Dominance and Expected Utility: Survey and Analysis843 cited
  • 1971Foundations of Measurement, Vol. I: Additive and Polynomial Representations757 cited
  • 1992The skewness of science713 cited
  • 2005Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

603 cited

Cited by

  • 2011Basic properties of both percentile rank scores and the I3 indicator58 cited
  • 2011Quantifying the degree of research collaboration: A comparative study of collaborative measures56 cited
  • 2012The journal impact factor: angel, devil, or scapegoat? A comment on J.K. Vanclay’s article 201154 cited
  • 2016Ranking authors using fractional counting of citations: An axiomatic approach41 cited
  • 2023Exploring the Major Trends and Emerging Themes of Artificial Intelligence in the Scientific Leading Journals amidst the COVID-19 Era40 cited
  • 2014An axiomatic approach to bibliometric rankings and indices40 cited
  • 2012The end of the “European Paradox”38 cited
  • 2010Consistent bibliometric rankings of authors and of journals37 cited
  • 2018Active Ageing: Mapping of Scientific Coverage36 cited
  • 2011Comparing impact factors from two different citation databases: The case of Computer Science34 cited
  • 2019A data science-based framework to categorize academic journals31 cited
  • 2013The h-bubble30 cited
  • 2013Year-based h-type indicators27 cited
  • 2012The Citation Merit of Scientific Publications26 cited
  • 2021Intellectual Structure and Evolution of Accounting Conservatism Research: Past Trends and Future Research Suggestions20 cited
  • 2015Expected number of citations and the crown indicator17 cited