SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
APPROPRIATE METHODOLOGIES FOR EMPIRICAL BIOETHICS: IT'S ALL RELATIVE
0 references·5 citing·16 second hop
APPROPRIATE METHODOLOGIES FOR EMPIRICAL BIOETHICS: IT'S ALL RELATIVE (2009)APPROPRIATE METHODOLOGIES FOR EMPIRICAL B…Systematic reviews of empirical literature on bioethical topics: Results from a meta-review (2020)Systematic reviews of empiric…Instrumentalist analyses of the functions of ethics concept-principles: a proposal for synergetic empirical and conceptual enrichment (2019)Instrumentalist analyses of t…An update on the “empirical turn” in bioethics: analysis of empirical research in nine bioethics journals (2018)An update on the “empirical t…Publishing Research in Empirical Bioethics: Quality, Disciplines and Expertise (2016)Publishing Research in Empiri…Disability and dignity-enabling home environments (2011)Disability and dignity-enabli…Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed) (1996)Justice and the Politics of Difference (2012)Clearing the path to transcend barriers to walking: Analysis of associations between perceptions and walking behaviour (2021)Empowering younger residents living in long-term care homes as co-researchers (2021)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Scientific Contribution. Empirical data and moral theory. A plea for integrated empirical ethics (2004)Empirical Ethics, Context-Sensitivity, and Contextualism (2005)EMPIRICAL ETHICS AND ITS ALLEGED META‐ETHICAL FALLACIES (2009)Between Facts and Norms (1996)Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. (2000)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)How to evaluate the quality of an ethical deliberation? A pragmatist proposal for evaluation criteria and collaborative research (2022)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2011Disability and dignity-enabling home environments60 cited
  • 2018An update on the “empirical turn” in bioethics: analysis of empirical research in nine bioethics journals44 cited
  • 2019Instrumentalist analyses of the functions of ethics concept-principles: a proposal for synergetic empirical and conceptual enrichment28 cited
  • 2020Systematic reviews of empirical literature on bioethical topics: Results from a meta-review14 cited
  • 2016Publishing Research in Empirical Bioethics: Quality, Disciplines and Expertise10 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work