SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Optional published refereeing
0 references·16 citing·18 second hop
Optional published refereeing (1978)Optional published refereeingWhen will the editors start to edit? (1982)When will the editors start t…What is the source of bias in peer review? (1982)What is the source of bias in…Theoretical implications of failure to detect prepublished submissions (1982)Theoretical implications of f…The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)The fate of published article…Rejection, rebuttal, revision: Some flexible features of peer review (1982)Rejection, rebuttal, revision…Publication, politics, and scientific progress (1982)Publication, politics, and sc…Perhaps it was right to reject the resubmitted manuscripts (1982)Perhaps it was right to rejec…Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Peer-review practices of psyc…Peer reviewing: Improve or be rejected (1982)Peer reviewing: Improve or be…Peer review: A philosophically faulty concept which is proving disastrous for science (1982)Peer review: A philosophicall…On the failure to detect previously published research (1982)On the failure to detect prev…On peer review: “We have met the enemy and he is us” (1982)On peer review: “We have met …Manuscript evaluation by journal referees and editors: Randomness or bias? (1982)Manuscript evaluation by jour…Interreferee agreement and acceptance rates in physics (1982)Interreferee agreement and ac…Editorial responsibilities in manuscript review (1982)Editorial responsibilities in…A physics editor comments on Peters and Ceci's peer-review study (1982)A physics editor comments on …Social Theory and Social Structure (1958)Statistical principles in experimental design. (1962)Toward an experimental ecology of human development. (1977)Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review (1991)The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Sustainability (2011)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Computer Support for Knowledge-Building Communities (1994)Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. (1995)Scientific Utopia (2012)Does the need for agreement among reviewers inhibit the publication controversial findings? (1991)Institutionalized Dualism: Statistical Significance Testing as Myth and Ceremony (2009)How blind is blind review? (1984)Is Review By Peers As Fair As It Appears (1982)Improving editorial procedures. (1990)Hypothesis Testing in Ecology: Psychological Aspects and the Importance of Theory Maturation (1987)Peer review for journals: Evidence on quality control, fairness, and innovation (1997)Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis (2007)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 1982Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again1,071 cited
  • 1982A physics editor comments on Peters and Ceci's peer-review study57 cited
  • 1982Peer review: A philosophically faulty concept which is proving disastrous for science51 cited
  • 1982Publication, politics, and scientific progress51 cited
  • 1982Manuscript evaluation by journal referees and editors: Randomness or bias?50 cited
  • 1982Interreferee agreement and acceptance rates in physics50 cited
  • 1982What is the source of bias in peer review?47 cited
  • 1982On peer review: “We have met the enemy and he is us”47 cited
  • 1982Perhaps it was right to reject the resubmitted manuscripts41 cited
  • 1982Peer reviewing: Improve or be rejected41 cited
  • 1982When will the editors start to edit?40 cited
  • 1982Theoretical implications of failure to detect prepublished submissions38 cited
  • 1982Rejection, rebuttal, revision: Some flexible features of peer review37 cited
  • 1982Editorial responsibilities in manuscript review16 cited
  • 1982The fate of published articles, submitted again

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

12 cited
  • 1982On the failure to detect previously published research12 cited