Construct and Content Validity of the Separation-Individuation Test of Adolescence: A Reply to Levine

Grayson N. Holmbeck · Glenn M. McClanahan

7 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Personality Assessment

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychological Testing and Assessment Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Personality Traits and Psychology

Abstract

The purpose of this commentary is to respond to Levine's (1994) critique of our earlier article (McClanahan & Holmbeck, 1992). We agree with Levine's argument that changes in the subscales of the Separation-Individuation Test of Adolescence (SITA; Levine, Green, & Millon, 1986) should be made based on both theoretical and statistical considerations. On the other hand, we also argue that attention needs to be paid to the content and construct validity of the SITA in future revisions of the measure.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 7 citations exist upstream.

References

1987The inventory of parent and peer attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence 1993Individual and relational predictors of adjustment in first-year college students.1986The Separation-Individuation Test of Adolescence 1992Separation-Individuation, Family Functioning, and Psychological Adjustment in College Students: A Construct Validity Study of the Separation-Individuation Test of Adolescence 1993Psychometric properties of the separation-individuation test of adolescence within a clinical population

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.