Your Terms or Mine? The Duty to Read the Fine Print in Contracts

Abstract

This paper examines the legal rules that govern the interpretation of standardized form contracts.Different legal rules induce different bargaining games between buyers and sellers, and can have consequences for the efficiency of exchange when communication is costly.The traditional common-law rule, which binds an assenting recipient of a form contract to fine-print terms he has not read, has little effect in encouraging parties to read contracts, contrary to the conventional wisdom among lawyers.Instead, there is little practical difference between a rule that nominally holds the drafter of a fQrm contract responsible for communicating its terms, and one that holds the receiving party responsible.Moreover, the traditional rule may be Pareto inferior to a rule providing presumptive warranties when negotiation is costly.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 56 citations exist upstream.