Predictions and home advantage for Australian rules football

Abstract

In a previous paper, it was demonstrated that distinctly different prediction methods when applied to 2435 American college and professional football games resulted in essentially the same fraction of correct selections of the winning team and essentially the same average absolute error for predicting the margin of victory. These results are now extended to 1446 Australian rules football games. Two distinctly different prediction methods are applied. A least-squares method provides a set of ratings. The predicted margin of victory in the next contest is less than the rating difference, corrected for home-ground advantage, while a 0.75 power method shrinks the ratings compared with those found by the least-squares technique and then performs predictions based on the rating difference and home-ground advantage. Both methods operate upon past margins of victory corrected for home advantage to obtain the ratings. It is shown that both methods perform similarly, based on the fraction of correct selections of the winning team and the average absolute error for predicting the margin of victory. That is, differing predictors using the same information tend to converge to a limiting level of accuracy. The least-squares approach also provides estimates of the accuracy of each prediction. The home advantage is evaluated for all teams collectively and also for individual teams. The data permit comparisons with other sports in other countries. The home team appears to have an advantage (the visiting team has a disadvantage) due to three factors:the visiting team suffers from travel fatigue; crowd intimidation by the home team fans; lack of familiarity with the playing conditions

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 61 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.