References

• 1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
• 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
• 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
• 2007Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration8,588 cited
• 2020Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,670 cited
• 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
• 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
• 1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
• 2003INTRODUCING LEVELS OF EVIDENCE TO THE JOURNAL1,298 cited
• 2002THE QUALITY OF REPORTING OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS IN THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY FROM 1988 THROUGH 2000243 cited
• 2004An observational study found that authors of randomized controlled trials frequently use concealment of randomization and blinding, despite the failure to report these methods209 cited
• 2006Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials?99 cited
• 2010Twenty Years of Meta-Analyses in Orthopaedic Surgery: Has Quality Kept Up with Quantity?84 cited