Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The eyewitness, the expert psychologist, and the jury.

16 references·16 citing·37 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1974Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases28,742 cited
1975Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases22,647 cited
1987Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The prosecutor's fallacy and the defense attorney's fallacy.407 cited
1979Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification.384 cited
1979Making Legal Language Understandable: A Psycholinguistic Study of Jury Instructions376 cited
1969Analyzing the expert judge: A descriptive study of a stockbroker's decision process.344 cited
1988Juror decision making in eyewitness identification cases.292 cited
1985The Psychology of Evidence and Trial Procedure278 cited
1990Juror sensitivity to eyewitness identification evidence.267 cited
1977Juridic decisions: In ignorance of the law or in light of it?184 cited
1983Eyewitness identification: What can a psychologist tell a jury?155 cited
1982Do jurors share a common understanding concerning eyewitness behavior?141 cited
1983The ability of prospective jurors to estimate the accuracy of eyewitness identifications.136 cited
1986The impact of general versus specific expert testimony and eyewitness confidence upon mock juror judgment.131 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1983

Making jury instructions understandable

125 cited

1982Improving the Ability of Jurors to Comprehend and Apply Criminal Jury Instructions121 cited

Cited by

1997Does expert psychological testimony inform or influence juror decision making? A social cognitive analysis.114 cited
1989Expert testimony and jury decision making: An empirical analysis101 cited
2010After 30 years, what do we know about what jurors know? A meta-analytic review of lay knowledge regarding eyewitness factors.93 cited
1995The case for expert testimony about eyewitness memory.84 cited
2001The other-race effect in eyewitness identification: What do we do about it?84 cited
1990Nonadversarial Methods for Sensitizing Jurors to Eyewitness Evidence77 cited
1992Battered woman syndrome evidence in the courtroom: A review of the literature.77 cited
2009Does Trial presentation medium matter in jury simulation research? Evaluating the effectiveness of eyewitness expert testimony73 cited
2002How effective are the cross-examination and expert testimony safeguards? Jurors' perceptions of the suggestiveness and fairness of biased lineup procedures.70 cited
2004The effects of rational and experiential information processing of expert testimony in death penalty cases68 cited
1994Expert testimony in child sexual abuse cases: Effects of expert evidence type and cross-examination.67 cited
1992The Psychology of Eyewitness Testimony: A Comparison of Experts and Prospective Jurors63 cited
2004Timing of Eyewitness Expert Testimony, Jurors' Need for Cognition, and Case Strength as Determinants of Trial Verdicts.61 cited
2004Impact of defense-only and opposing eyewitness experts on juror judgments.57 cited
2003Deliberating on dangerousness and death: jurors' ability to differentiate between expert actuarial and clinical predictions of dangerousness49 cited
2006Socioeconomic Status and Belief in a Just World: Sentencing of Criminal Defendants148 cited