References

• 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
• 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
• 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
• 2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
• 2006The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor2,765 cited
• 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials2,754 cited
• 2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials2,545 cited
• 1996Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews538 cited
• 2002Quality of Reporting of Randomized Trials as a Measure of Methodologic Quality397 cited
• 2006What Is the Methodologic Quality of Human Therapy Studies in ISI Surgical Publications?57 cited
• 2005The Quality of Medical Record Review Studies in the International Emergency Medicine Literature57 cited
• 2005For randomized controlled trials, the quality of reports of complementary and alternative medicine was as good as reports of conventional medicine56 cited
• 2006Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in Hodgkin Lymphoma in Biomedical Journals