The Constitution of Deliberative Democracy

Cheryl Misak · Carlos Santiago Nino

301 citations0/0 files storedUniversity of Toronto Law Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Political Theory and Democracy Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies Political Philosophy and Ethics

Abstract

What justifies democracy? This question is considered critically, examining answers others have given to it. The author also develops his own theory of democracy, arguing that it resembles a moral conversation and is valued because of its capacity to generate an impartial perspective.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 301 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2004Collective preferences in democratic politics: opinion surveys and the will of the people 2015Liquid Democracy: Potentials, Problems, and Perspectives 2015Epistemic Democracy and Its Challenges 1998Voter ignorance and the democratic ideal 2002The Practice of Deliberative Democracy: A Study of 16 Deliberative Organizations 2015The Guardian of the Constitution 2003Technology Theory and Deliberative Democracy 2000Consensus Conferences as Deliberative Democracy

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.