User studies have been conducted for many years in the information and library science fields. In the archival world, this phenomenon has not been as common and less emphasis has been placed on collecting and studying the user's perspective in general. However, there are studies showing the use of these types of studies, particularly in the justification for, and explanation of, archival resources. This review article will present the literature on user studies of archival finding aids, while incorporating some of the preliminary user theory that led to, and resulted from, archival user studies. It will then focus more specifically on Encoded Archival Description (EAD) finding aids, arguing that the lack of user studies in EAD has been a possible determinant to the more widespread acceptance of this descriptive standard among archivists. Have some well-intentioned archivists prematurely put the under-developed cart before fine-tuning the horse? Perhaps this will prove harmless in the long run, not alienating users from future online archival displays that use EAD. Perhaps users will easily learn how to use EAD finding aids and come to appreciate their unique qualities. This article explores what archival colleagues think and what they are advocating.
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 16 citations exist upstream.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.