Enharmonic systems: A theory of key signatures, enharmonic equivalence and diatonicism

Abstract

Key signatures and enharmonic equivalence are taken as points of departure for a study of the diatonic–chromatic relationship. Key signatures are modelled by signature vectors, i.e. seven-dimensional vectors with integer coordinates, each coordinate indicating the number of sharps (+) or flats (−) assigned to one of the seven letter names. A definition of standard signature vectors (those corresponding to the usual key signature of some major key) is readily formulated. These constructions do not depend on any convention regarding enharmonic equivalence of note names, but enharmonic equivalence (EE) conditions are intimately connected with key signatures, and in fact may also be formalized in terms of signature vectors, called in this context EE vectors. The canonical EE vector gives rise to a familiar twelve-note enharmonic system, but other systems are possible. Connections with maximal evenness and other properties familiar in diatonic set theory are investigated. The usual staff notation, including key signatures, may be realized within any enharmonic system, and various transformations (diatonic and chromatic transposition, and signature transformations that alter the key signature) may be applied to music thus notated. The interaction between the EE vector defining a system and the signature vector defining a seven-note subset thereof is subtle and sometimes unexpected. Several non-canonical enharmonic systems are explored, including those used in the Twelve Microtonal Etudes of Easley Blackwood.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 17 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.