AN EVALUATION OF ELICITATION PROCEDURES FOR PERSONAL CONSTRUCTS

Franz R. Epting · David Ira Suchman · CARL J. NICKESON

70 citations0/0 files storedBritish Journal of Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Cognitive and psychological constructs research Psychological Testing and Assessment Q Methodology Applications

Abstract

The opposite method (OM) and the difference method (DM) for eliciting personal constructs were evaluated with regard to the number of bipolar constructs produced. This evaluation is an investigation of how the constructs were used in a grid procedure and how they were reported in a structured interview. Comparing the two methods, using the grid procedure, the OM produced a greater number of bipolar constructs. Responses to the interview were incomplete. Explanations for this observed difference between methods are proposed.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 70 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

1992The stability of structural measures derived from repertory grids 1999A COMPARISON OF TRIADIC AND DYADIC METHODS OF PERSONAL CONSTRUCT ELICITATION 1998Teoría de los constructos personales: aplicaciones a la práctica psicológica 1978Repertory Grids in Educational Research: some methodological considerations 2001Bipolarity … or not? Some Conceptual Problems Relating to Bipolar Rating Scales 1977Perceived Environmental Utility under the Influence of Alternative Transportation Systems: A Framework for Analysis

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.