From Great Women to Top Girls : Pageants of Sisterhood in British Feminist Theater

Abstract

Caryl Churchill's groundbreaking play Top Girls (1982) opens with a fleeting fantasy of transnational, transhistorical sisterhood as an eclectic group of eminent women, historical and fictional, gather to celebrate an apparent feminist victory--the promotion of a contemporary, high-powered businesswoman to a management position previously held by men. Sixty years earlier, at height of British women's suffrage movement, similarly fantastic gatherings of notable women from various nations and centuries were staged in support of women's rights. Like Top Girls, Pageant of Great Women (1909) and Women's Coronation Procession (1911) revived famous women from history and drew them into a contemporary feminist cause. By bringing together women from different time periods and geographic locations, all three productions present their audiences with a spectacle of female solidarity extending across national, cultural, and class boundaries. These pageants of sisterhood enact a fundamental feminist principle; as feminist theorist Rosi Braidotti observes, the recognition of a of commonality among women ... is foundation stone that allows for feminist position or standpoint to be articulated. (1) In dramatizing this bond of commonality, however, these productions express a feminist ideal more than they do a material reality; all three performances of united sisterhood signs of strain, though with different degrees of self-awareness. My purpose in this essay is to consider how British feminist productions with largely female casts from both ends of twentieth century appropriated elements of pageantry to create a vision of sisterhood responsive to feminism of their day. I begin with two suffrage-era productions that exploit modern pageant revival to garner support for a feminist cause: Cicely Hamilton's pageant play Pageant of Great Women, first performed in November 1909 at a large fundraising event for Actresses' Franchise League, and massive Women's Coronation Procession of 17 June 1911, whose purpose was to show strength of demand to win Votes for Women in Coronation year. (2) I then turn to a more recent feminist play, Caryl Churchill's Top Girls from 1982, whose opening act incorporates elements of pageantry reminiscent of suffrage pageants as colorful historical women gather around a dinner table in a spectacle that might at first appear to represent female solidarity across cultures and history, but which soon dissolves into conflict and chaos. Placing these somewhat disparate moments in British feminist theater in dialogue with one another brings out revealing convergences and discrepancies in their uses of women's history, particularly their representations of women's power and martyrdom, and in their constructions of sisterhood. Anticipating some of concerns of transnational feminism, Churchill's dystopian vision of fractured sisterhood throws into relief suffrage pageants' fantasy of universal, united sisterhood by encouraging attention to national, ideological, and class differences that must be elided to achieve such idealized visions of female solidarity. Despite her attentiveness to differences among women, however, Churchill does not deny possibility of sisterhood altogether, but uses Brechtian methods to suggest its possibility beyond social conditions represented in play. All three productions, to varying degrees, reveal tensions between potent feminist ideal of united sisterhood and material differences and disparities among women that ideal seeks to overcome. I. Cicely Hamilton's Pageant of Great Women, 1909 Pageant of Great Women exploited for feminist purposes pageant revival sweeping Britain and United States in first decade of twentieth century. Launched by Louis Napoleon Parker's large-scale historical pageant celebrating twelve hundredth anniversary of town of Sherbourne in 1905, modern pageant movement was a deliberate return to Renaissance pageantry inspired by late nineteenth-century arts and crafts movement. …

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 10 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.