SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
How research funders can finance APCs in full OA and hybrid journals
0 references·16 citing·50 second hop
How research funders can finance APCs in full OA and hybrid journals (2014)How research funders can finance APCs in …How open are hybrid journals included in transformative agreements? (2025)How open are hybrid journals …Determinants of article processing charges for hybrid and gold open access journals (2022)Determinants of article proce…Choices of immediate open access and the relationship to journal ranking and publish-and-read deals (2022)Choices of immediate open acc…Bibliodiversity at the Centre: Decolonizing Open Access (2021)Bibliodiversity at the Centre…Open Sesame? Open access priorities, incentives, and policies among higher education institutions in the United Arab Emirates (2020)Open Sesame? Open access prio…Charting the Open Access scholarly journals landscape in the UAE (2020)Charting the Open Access scho…Altruism or Self-Interest? Exploring the Motivations of Open Access Authors (2019)Altruism or Self-Interest? Ex…Survive or perish: Investigating the life cycle of academic journals from 1950 to 2013 using survival analysis methods (2018)Survive or perish: Investigat…Are Funder Open Access Platforms a Good Idea? (2018)Are Funder Open Access Platfo…Are funder Open Access platforms a good idea? (2018)Are funder Open Access platfo…Measuring the Impact of Gold and Green Open Access (2017)Measuring the Impact of Gold …Researchers’ Adoption of an Institutional Central Fund for Open-Access Article-Processing Charges (2016)Researchers’ Adoption of an I…Free‐to‐publish, free‐to‐read, or both? Cost, equality of access, and integrity in science publishing (2016)Free‐to‐publish, free‐to‐read…Measuring compliance with a S panish G overnment open access mandate (2015)Measuring compliance with a S…Business process costs of implementing “gold” and “green” open access in institutional and national contexts (2015)Business process costs of imp…The library's role in the management and funding of open access publishing (2014)The library's role in the man…Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability (1973)The access principle: the case for open access to research and scholarship (2006)Open Access (2012)Only two out of five articles by New Zealand researchers are free-to-access: a multiple API study of access, citations, cost of Article Processing Charges (APC), and the potential to increase the proportion of open access (2021)The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access (2004)Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research (2010)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)Spanish researchers’ opinions, attitudes and practices towards open access publishing (2017)Measuring open access publications: a novel normalized open access indicator (2020)Journal Open Access and Plan S: Solving Problems or Shifting Burdens? (2021)Diffusion of Innovations (1963)Diffusion of innovations. (2003)Opening the Black Box of Scholarly Communication Funding: A Public Data Infrastructure for Financial Flows in Academic Publishing (2016)French publishing attitudes in the open access era: The case of mathematics, biology, and computer science (2018)Diffusion of Innovations 1 (2019)Preprints and Scholarly Communication: Adoption, Practices, Drivers and Barriers (2019)Comparing the Impact of Open Access (OA) vs. Non-OA Articles in the Same Journals (2004)Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009 (2010)Green and gold open access citation and interdisciplinary advantage: A bibliometric study of two science journals (2019)Is open access publication useful for all research fields? Presence of funding, collaboration and impact (2020)Understanding the increasing market share of the academic publisher “Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute” in the publication output of Central and Eastern European countries: a case study of Hungary (2022)Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)Promoting an open research culture (2015)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)An overview of Open Access publishing in palaeontology (2019)Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact (2011)Publication fees in open access publishing: Sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal (2011)Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact (2012)Factors influencing the adoption and use of open access scholarly communication among researchers in India (2022)Factors affecting authors' manuscript submission behaviour: A systematic review (2023)Dissemination of scientific information through open access by research scientists in a developing country (2024)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Evaluating the relationship between the academic and social impact of open access books based on citation behaviors and social media attention (2020)The Democratisation Myth: Open Access and the Solidification of Epistemic Injustices (2020)Mapping of water research in Morocco: A scientometric analysis (2021)Performance-based university research funding systems (2011)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)Trading‐off monetary rewards as reinforcers to enhance task motivation and performance of publication in academia (2021)Factors influencing researchers to publish in open-access: Is it a self-decision or a self-reinforcing cycle? (2022)Open access movement in the scholarly world: Pathways for libraries in developing countries (2023)A Geopolitics Of Academic Writing (2002)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Open access at a crossroads: library publishing and bibliodiversity (2023)Who Counts? (2023)The journal and the quest for epistemic justice (2024)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic (2021)The OpenAlex database in review: Evaluating its applications, capabilities, and limitations (2026)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2017Measuring the Impact of Gold and Green Open Access66 cited
  • 2021Bibliodiversity at the Centre: Decolonizing Open Access46 cited
  • 2015Measuring compliance with a S panish G overnment open access mandate38 cited
  • 2019Altruism or Self-Interest? Exploring the Motivations of Open Access Authors25 cited
  • 2016Researchers’ Adoption of an Institutional Central Fund for Open-Access Article-Processing Charges22 cited
  • 2025How open are hybrid journals included in transformative agreements?21 cited
  • 2020Charting the Open Access scholarly journals landscape in the UAE19 cited
  • 2015Business process costs of implementing “gold” and “green” open access in institutional and national contexts18 cited
  • 2020Open Sesame? Open access priorities, incentives, and policies among higher education institutions in the United Arab Emirates18 cited
  • 2018Are funder Open Access platforms a good idea?18 cited
  • 2014The library's role in the management and funding of open access publishing18 cited
  • 2022Determinants of article processing charges for hybrid and gold open access journals16 cited
  • 2016Free‐to‐publish, free‐to‐read, or both? Cost, equality of access, and integrity in science publishing14 cited
  • 2018

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Are Funder Open Access Platforms a Good Idea?
14 cited
  • 2018Survive or perish: Investigating the life cycle of academic journals from 1950 to 2013 using survival analysis methods14 cited
  • 2022Choices of immediate open access and the relationship to journal ranking and publish-and-read deals12 cited