Case in Sakha: are two modalities really necessary?Theodore Levin, Omer Preminger2014-07-02articleNatural Language & Linguistic Theory160 citationsgreenNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic VariationLanguage Development and DisordersLinguistics and Cultural StudiesAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 160 citations exist upstream.References1993Lectures on Government and Binding2001Derivation by Phase1984Lectures on government and binding . By Noam Chomsky. (Studies in generative grammar, 9.) Dordrecht, Holland, & Cinnaminson, NJ: Foris, 1981. Pp. 371. Cloth f 90.00, paper f 50.00. - Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding . By Noam Chomsky. (Linguistic Inquiry monographs, 6.) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1982. Pp. 110. Cloth $20.00, paper $7.95.2000Step by step : essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik2008The Syntax of Agreement and Concord2008On Phases1996THE STRUCTURAL DETERMINATION OF CASE AND AGREEMENT1991Two Functional Categories in Noun Phrases: Evidence from Modern HebrewCited by2017On Inherent and Dependent Theories of Ergative Case2017Lexical Category and Alignment in Austronesian2018On Partial Agreement and Oblique Case2017Deconstructing Iranian Ergativity2016Successive-cyclic case assignment: Korean nominative-nominative case-stacking2017The Ergative in Warlpiri: A Case Study2017Three-Way Systems do not Exist2017Ergativity and Austronesian-Type Voice Systems