SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Inconsistencies between reported test statistics and p‐values in two psychiatry journals
3 references·5 citing·36 second hop
Inconsistencies between reported test statistics and p‐values in two psychiatry journals (2007)Inconsistencies between reported test sta…The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement…A Primer on the Understanding, Use, and Calculation of Confidence Intervals That Are Based on Central and Noncentral Distributions (2001)A Primer on the Understanding…The earth is round (p < .05). (1994)The earth is round (p < .05).Tracing scientific reasoning in psychiatry: Reporting of statistical inference in abstracts of top journals 1975–2015 (2018)Tracing scientific reasoning …Statistical Reporting Errors and Collaboration on Statistical Analyses in Psychological Science (2014)Statistical Reporting Errors …Intervention Effectiveness Research in Adolescent Health Psychology: Methodological Issues and Strategies (2013)Intervention Effectiveness Re…When ab ≠ c – c′: Published errors in the reports of single-mediator models (2012)When ab ≠ c – c′: Published e…Evaluating the Surgery Literature (2009)Evaluating the Surgery Litera…Human Error (1990)The New Statistics (2013)Promoting replicable sexual science: A methodological review and call for metascience (2016)Who Believes in the Storybook Image of the Scientist? (2016)Perspectives on scientific error (2023)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Replication and p Intervals: p Values Predict the Future Only Vaguely, but Confidence Intervals Do Much Better (2008)Point and interval estimates of effect sizes for the case-controls design in neuropsychology: Rationale, methods, implementations, and proposed reporting standards (2010)The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles. (2012)Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (2015)Belief in the law of small numbers. (1971)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists (2007)Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. (2011)The Logic of Scientific Discovery (2013)Estimating Psychological Networks and their Accuracy: A Tutorial Paper (2016)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? (2003)Scientific and statistical reviews of manuscripts submitted to Nursing Research: Comparison of completeness, quality, and usefulness (2010)The Handbook of Social Psychology (1969)Dual-process theories in social psychology (1999)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Verify Original Results through Reanalysis before Replicating: A Commentary on “Making Replication Mainstream” by Rolf A. Zwaan, Alexander Etz, Richard E. Lucas, & M. Brent Donnellan (2018)Comparing the prevalence of statistical reporting inconsistencies in COVID-19 preprints and matched controls: a registered report (2023)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1991)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1994The earth is round (p < .05).3,999 cited
  • 2001The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration3,828 cited
  • 2001A Primer on the Understanding, Use, and Calculation of Confidence Intervals That Are Based on Central and Noncentral Distributions527 cited

Cited by

  • 2014Statistical Reporting Errors and Collaboration on Statistical Analyses in Psychological Science69 cited
  • 2012When ab ≠ c – c′: Published errors in the reports of single-mediator models13 cited
  • 2009Evaluating the Surgery Literature11 cited
  • 2013Intervention Effectiveness Research in Adolescent Health Psychology: Methodological Issues and Strategies11 cited
  • 2018Tracing scientific reasoning in psychiatry: Reporting of statistical inference in abstracts of top journals 1975–20158 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work