Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The Life of p : “Just Significant” Results are on the Rise

14 references·16 citing·37 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1979The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.9,043 cited
2011False-Positive Psychology6,561 cited
2011Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association3,167 cited
2012Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling2,240 cited
2011Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association1,451 cited
2004Beyond significance testing: Reforming data analysis methods in behavioral research.1,033 cited
2012Registered Reports: A new publishing initiative at Cortex572 cited
2001Publication and Related Biases465 cited
2008Replication and p Intervals: p Values Predict the Future Only Vaguely, but Confidence Intervals Do Much Better451 cited
2000Publication and related biases.427 cited
2011The (mis)reporting of statistical results in psychology journals356 cited
2012A peculiar prevalence of p values just below .05266 cited
2003Changing trends in publishing behaviour among university faculty, 1980-2000139 cited
2012Letting the daylight in: Reviewing the reviewers and other ways to maximize transparency in science60 cited

Cited by

2014Meta-analyses and p-curves support robust cycle shifts in women’s mate preferences: Reply to Wood and Carden (2014) and Harris, Pashler, and Mickes (2014).

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

91 cited

2014Statistical Reporting Errors and Collaboration on Statistical Analyses in Psychological Science69 cited

2015Questionable Research Practices in Experimental Communication Research: A Systematic Analysis From 1980 to 201366 cited

2022Detecting p‐Hacking61 cited

2014Comment: What p -hacking really looks like: A comment on Masicampo and LaLande (2012)56 cited

2015The Search for Significance: A Few Peculiarities in the Distribution of P Values in Experimental Psychology Literature52 cited

2016Conservative Tests under Satisficing Models of Publication Bias45 cited

2015On the challenges of drawing conclusions from p -values just below 0.0544 cited

2020Replication crisis or an opportunity to improve scientific production?44 cited

2015Blinded by the Light: How a Focus on Statistical “Significance” May Causep-Value Misreporting and an Excess ofp-Values Just Below .05 in Communication Science41 cited

2018A 20-Year Review of Outcome Reporting Bias in Moderated Multiple Regression39 cited

2017Some properties of p-curves, with an application to gradual publication bias.38 cited

2022Big Little Lies: A Compendium and Simulation of p-Hacking Strategies34 cited

2017Examining publication bias—a simulation-based evaluation of statistical tests on publication bias27 cited

2018Results-blind review: a masked crusader for science20 cited

2019Research practices and statistical reporting quality in 250 economic psychology master's theses: a meta-research investigation17 cited