The Production Function and the Theory of Capital: A Comment

David G. Champernowne

96 citations0/0 files storedThe Review of Economic Studies

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Economic Theory and Policy Political Economy and Marxism Economic theories and models

Abstract

D. G. Champernowne; The Production Function and the Theory of Capital: A Comment, The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 21, Issue 2, 1 January 1953, Pages 112–

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 96 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

1970Heterogeneous Capital, the Production Function and the Theory of Distribution 2003Retrospectives Whatever Happened to the Cambridge Capital Theory Controversies?2003Aggregation in Production Functions: What Applied Economists should Know 1976THE CAMBRIDGE CONTROVERSIES: OLD WAYS AND NEW HORIZONS—OR DEAD END? 1 1969The Implications of Alternative Saving and Expectations Hypotheses for Choices of Technique and Patterns of Growth 1973The Badly Behaved Economy with the Well-Behaved Production Function 2007The Structure of Post-Keynesian Economics: The Core Contributions of the Pioneers 2004Constructing Identity: The Post Keynesians and the Capital Controversies

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.