References

• 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
• 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
• 1991Publication bias in clinical research3,110 cited
• 2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
• 1998meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies1,370 cited
• 2000Publication bias in meta-analysis its causes and consequences1,293 cited
• 2010Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases1,039 cited
• 1997Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German1,029 cited
• 2002Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study891 cited
• 1997Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects820 cited
• 1988Publication Bias: A Problem in Interpreting Medical Data814 cited
• 1987Publication bias and clinical trials715 cited
• 2005Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors612 cited
• 1995Methodologic guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized control trials in health care from the potsdam consultation on meta-analysis