SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The history of the peer-review process
0 references·16 citing·48 second hop
The history of the peer-review process (2002)The history of the peer-review processThe risk of fake controversies for Brazilian environmental policies (2022)The risk of fake controversie…Research Design in Clinical Psychology (2021)Research Design in Clinical P…Qualitative Research Methods (2021)Qualitative Research MethodsOverburdening of peer reviewers: A multi‐stakeholder perspective on causes and effects (2021)Overburdening of peer reviewe…Misinformation in and about science (2021)Misinformation in and about s…Peer Review Bias: A Critical Review (2019)Peer Review Bias: A Critical …Gender differences in peer review outcomes and manuscript impact at six journals of ecology and evolution (2019)Gender differences in peer re…The state of the art in peer review (2018)The state of the art in peer …What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)What is open peer review? A s…What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)What is open peer review? A s…A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review (2017)A multi-disciplinary perspect…Social Return on Investment (SROI) methodology to account for value for money of public health interventions: a systematic review (2015)Social Return on Investment (…Emerging trends in peer review—a survey (2015)Emerging trends in peer revie…A century of physics (2015)A century of physicsPeer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide. (2014)Peer Review in Scientific Pub…A wiki for the life sciences where authorship matters (2008)A wiki for the life sciences …The Chronicle of Higher Education (1977)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Does health informatics have a replication crisis? (2018)Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature (2020)Bad Beliefs (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Theory-based evaluations: Framing the existence of a new theory in evaluation and the rise of the 5th generation (2018)Identifying different sustainable practices to help companies to contribute to the sustainable development: Holistic sustainability, sustainable business and operations models (2022)The social return on investment model: a systematic literature review (2022)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought (2013)The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)AI-assisted peer review (2021)Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)Bias in peer review (2012)Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students (2012)Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science (2013)Peer review and gender bias: A study on 145 scholarly journals (2021)Promoting inclusive metrics of success and impact to dismantle a discriminatory reward system in science (2021)Women and Global South strikingly underrepresented among top‐publishing ecologists (2021)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)The spread of true and false news online (2018)Synthesizing evidence in sustainability science through harmonized experiments: Community monitoring in common pool resources (2021)Synthetic Lies: Understanding AI-Generated Misinformation and Evaluating Algorithmic and Human Solutions (2023)Trust in scientists and their role in society across 68 countries (2024)Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (1988)A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder (2006)Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It (2011)Collaboration and opportunism in megaproject alliance contracts: The interplay between governance, trust and culture (2021)The impact of COVID‐19 pandemic on Australian domestic and family violence services and their clients (2021)The transition towards a circular economy. A framework for SMEs (2022)Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Open peer review: promoting transparency in open science (2020)Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review (2022)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Characteristics of academic publications, preprints, and registered clinical trials on the COVID-19 pandemic (2020)Superiority of external attentional focus for motor performance and learning: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. (2021)Toward a sustainability organizational culture model (2023)Mechanisms of change in multisystemic therapy: Reducing delinquent behavior through therapist adherence and improved family and peer functioning. (2000)The role of qualitative research in psychological journals. (2002)The influence of contextual factors on tic expression in Tourette's syndrome: A review (2008)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2017What is open peer review? A systematic review453 cited
  • 2014Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide.399 cited
  • 2021Misinformation in and about science391 cited
  • 2017A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review293 cited
  • 2015Social Return on Investment (SROI) methodology to account for value for money of public health interventions: a systematic review281 cited
  • 2021Qualitative Research Methods276 cited
  • 2021Research Design in Clinical Psychology239 cited
  • 2017What is open peer review? A systematic review232 cited
  • 2015Emerging trends in peer review—a survey192 cited
  • 2019Gender differences in peer review outcomes and manuscript impact at six journals of ecology and evolution189 cited
  • 2008A wiki for the life sciences where authorship matters185 cited
  • 2018The state of the art in peer review171 cited
  • 2019Peer Review Bias: A Critical Review165 cited
  • 2015A century of physics153 cited
  • 2021Overburdening of peer reviewers: A multi‐stakeholder perspective on causes and effects

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

73 cited
  • 2022The risk of fake controversies for Brazilian environmental policies71 cited