References

• 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
• 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
• 1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
• 2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
• 1994Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews2,256 cited
• 1997Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions2,184 cited
• 1992A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction1,517 cited
• 2000Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses1,398 cited
• 1995Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists1,306 cited
• 1997Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials1,170 cited
• 1997Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German1,029 cited
• 1994Users' Guides to the Medical Literature813 cited
• 2000Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses?811 cited