Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Instruments for Assessing the Quality of Drug Studies Published in the Medical Literature

6 references·16 citing·42 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1981A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial1,349 cited
1987Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research1,267 cited
1992Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis640 cited
1982Reporting on Methods in Clinical Trials509 cited
1958Intraclass Correlation and the Analysis of Variance399 cited
1986A quality assessment of randomized control trials of primary treatment of breast cancer.195 cited

Cited by

2013Instruments for Assessing Risk of Bias and Other Methodological Criteria of Published Animal Studies: A Systematic Review147 cited
1999Assessing “Best Evidence”: Issues in Grading the Quality of Studies for Systematic Reviews134 cited
2010Development quality criteria to evaluate nontherapeutic studies of incidence, prevalence, or risk factors of chronic diseases: pilot study of new checklists133 cited
2009Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 4: Observational Studies129 cited
2009No short-cut in assessing trial quality: a case study109 cited
2002Publication bias in gastroenterological research – a retrospective cohort study based on abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting103 cited
2005Do the findings of case series studies vary significantly according to methodological characteristics?92 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2003Development of a quality assessment scale for retrospective clinical studies in pediatric surgery91 cited

2013Down with the Hierarchies87 cited

1998Systematic reviews of trials and other studies.78 cited

2018Stratification by quality induced selection bias in a meta-analysis of clinical trials75 cited

2002Impact of quality scales on levels of evidence inferred from a systematic review of exercise therapy and low back pain68 cited

2000Judging the ‘weight of evidence’ in systematic reviews:introducing rigour into the qualitative overview stage by assessing Signal and Noise61 cited

2013Inconsistency in the items included in tools used in general health research and physical therapy to evaluate the methodological quality of randomized controlled trials: a descriptive analysis60 cited

2000Electronic Trial Banks: A Complementary Method for Reporting Randomized Trials52 cited

2005Evaluating the role of quality assessment of primary studies in systematic reviews of cancer practice guidelines48 cited