Poor Reporting of Quality of Life Outcomes in Dermatology Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because many dermatological diseases are chronic but not life-threatening, consideration of their impact on health-related quality of life (QOL) seems essential. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the use of QOL as an evaluation endpoint in randomized clinical trials concerning skin diseases. METHODS: Studies identified by computerized search of 3 bibliographical databases were selected, and their data on QOL as an evaluation endpoint were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 67 studies retained, 87% did not adequately describe the questionnaires; 75% did not address handling of missing data; 95% did not calculate the number of subjects needed to obtain the desired statistical power; 95% did not disclose before-and-after results as means of overall scores and each dimension. CONCLUSION: Our analysis highlighted methodological weaknesses in the use of QOL questionnaire and poor reporting of QOL outcomes in randomized clinical trials.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 42 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.