Creation Science Is Not Science

Michael Ruse

57 citations0/0 files storedScience Technology & Human Values

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Evolution and Science Education Science Education and Pedagogy Philosophy and History of Science

Abstract

This article is the first piece of a three-piece exchange between Michael Ruse and Larry Laudan. (We will be reading all three pieces.) Ruse, a prominent philosopher of science (particularly biology), served as an expert witness in a trial concerning the constitutionality of an Arkansas law requiring public school biology teachers to present creationism as a viable scientific alternative to evolutionary theory.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 57 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2011Epistemic Relativism, Epistemic Incommensurability, and Wittgensteinian Epistemology 2007Better Red than Dead—Putting an End to the Social Irrelevance of Postwar Philosophy of Science 2007Popper, Laws, and the Exclusion of Biology from Genuine Science 2002Scientific atheism as a faith tradition 2020Pain communication: An agenda for communication researchers 2023Chemistry's Metaphysics 2019Are Pseudosciences Like Seagulls? A Discriminant Metacriterion Facilitates the Solution of the Demarcation Problem 2021Naturalizm metodologiczny w sporze ewolucjonizmu z kreacjonizmem w świetle poglądów Paula K. Feyerabenda

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.