Received Pronunciation and Realphonetik

Abstract

ABSTRACT:An analysis of the literature and dictionaries regarding Received Pronunciation (RP) shows that RP is improperly and ambiguously defined, uses inconsistent phonetic transcriptions, lacks standard vowel and articulatory charts, uses and substitutes generic phonemic transcription for actual phonetic transcription, is not based on a clear policy as to its appropriate areas of application or relationship to other dialects, is not established on the basis of enlightened majority rule, and serves to impose a tiny minority and arbitrary standard on a vast worldwide majority, thereby producing intolerance and linguistic oppression, or what is called ‘linguistic imperialism.’ To correct such problems and put RP on a more scientific basis, the logic of definition is used to define RP; standard articulation and an extended vowel chart are proposed; 1989/1993 IPA. phonetic symbols are used, and other corrections and analyses given. A proposal is made to replace RP with ‘British Pronunciation’(BP), which would be based on an actual and adequate descriptive phonetics, called here,Realphonetik.Guidelines and requirements are proposed if it is to be used as a standard. It is proposed that BP, as well as other dialects, including American pronunciation, be taught in the schools, but that IPA phonetics be taught as well so that the various pronunciations may be properly compared and rendered. A comprehensive English language phonetics bibliography is included at the end of the analysis.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 4 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.