SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
What Happens to Rejected Astronomical Papers?
1 references·8 citing·24 second hop
What Happens to Rejected Astronomical Papers? (1988)What Happens to Rejected Astronomical Pap…A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine (1992)A Difficult Balance: Editoria…Rejection Rates for Journals Publishing in the Atmospheric Sciences (2010)Rejection Rates for Journals …Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review (1991)Reliability, fairness, object…Referee agreement in context (1991)Referee agreement in contextIn praise of randomness (1991)In praise of randomnessDoes the need for agreement among reviewers inhibit the publication controversial findings? (1991)Does the need for agreement a…Does group discussion contribute reliability of complex judgments? (1991)Does group discussion contrib…A study of the publishing activity of astronomers since 1969 (1991)A study of the publishing act…A Study of the Publishing Activity of Astronomers since 1969 (1987)A Study of the Publishing Act…A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Individual versus general structured feedback to improve agreement in grant peer review: a randomized controlled trial (2021)Peer reviewer topic choice and its impact on interrater reliability: A mixed-method study (2022)Variability and negligence: grant peer review panels evaluating impact ex ante (2024)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)At what Ages did Outstanding American Astronomers Publish Their Most-Cited Papers (1983)Citations to Single and Multiauthored Papers (1984)The frequency distribution of scientific productivity (1926)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)Going beyond journal classification for evaluation of research outputs (2005)Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system (1971)How to write and publish a scientific paper (1990)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Is interactive open access publishing able to identify high-impact submissions? A study on the predictive validity of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics by using percentile rank classes (2010)Establishing Sensible and Practical Guidelines for Desk Rejections (2017)Predatory publishing and the Ghana experience: A call to action for information professionals (2019)Do men and women perform academic work differently? (2015)Research Program Peer Review: Purposes, Principles, Practices, Protocols (2004)The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)A COMPARISON OF THE INFORMATION SEEKING PATTERNS OF RESEARCHERS IN THE PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES (1993)Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience: Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone? (2000)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1992A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine212 cited

Cited by

  • 1991Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review55 cited
  • 1991Does the need for agreement among reviewers inhibit the publication controversial findings?39 cited
  • 2010Rejection Rates for Journals Publishing in the Atmospheric Sciences36 cited
  • 1991A study of the publishing activity of astronomers since 196916 cited
  • 1991Referee agreement in context12 cited
  • 1987A Study of the Publishing Activity of Astronomers since 196911 cited
  • 1991In praise of randomness7 cited
  • 1991Does group discussion contribute reliability of complex judgments?0 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work