Brazilian income distribution in the 1960s: Tacts’ model results and the controversy

Edmar Bacha · Lance J. Taylor

69 citations0/0 files storedThe Journal of Development Studies

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Economic Theory and Policy Labor market dynamics and wage inequality Income, Poverty, and Inequality

Abstract

This paper discusses a number of hypotheses that have been put forward to explain apparently unequalising changes in Brazilian income distribution in the 1960s. One of these argues that, if more relevant measures are used, the increase in distributional inequity is apparent only. This hypothesis is rejected after conceptual and statistical criticism. Of the hypotheses which accept increased inequity in distribution in the 1960s, one emphasises the importance of changes in the composition of the income‐earning population (by education, sex, sector, age and region). But it is shown here that these compositional effects were either in an equalising direction (regional; sectoral) or quantitively small (sex, age and education). The argument that the rise in distributional inequity was caused by growth‐induced demand for skills forcing up the rewards for skill, is also rejected. The increase in the supply of skilled labour in the 1960s was very large, and with plausible elasticities of substitution and a competitive labour market, the rewards for skills must have fallen. Detailed analysis of Brazilian wage‐fixing institutions suggests that the government was able, despite some wage drift, to hold back increases in real wages by squeezing minimum money wages and allowing firms to pass on increased labour costs in output prices. This is consistent with a shift in the functional distribution in favour of profits. It is also consistent with a picture of the labour market as one of two non‐competing groups, managers who are paid wage‐spreading increases—their share in the income left over after the labourers are paid their wages. Mutual consistency of partial explanations does not, of course, guarantee their correctness.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 69 citations exist upstream.

References

2019Economic Growth and Income Inequality 1972Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis.1969Economics and Information Theory 2020Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis 1967Economics and Information Theory 1976Inequality, poverty and development 1976The Challenge of Segmented Labor Market Theories to Orthodox Theory: A Survey 1972Brazilian Size Distribution of Income

Cited by

2004The Microeconomics of Income Distribution Dynamics in East Asia and Latin America 2005The effects of the minimum wage in Brazil on the distribution of family incomes: 1996–2001 2009Brazil as an economic superpower?: understanding Brazil's changing role in the global economy 1991Wage inequality and the distribution of education

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.