Researchers, Sex Differences, and the Holtzman Inkblot Technique: A Reply to Rice, Greenfield, Alexander, and Sternbach

Jon D. Swartz

0 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Personality Assessment

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychological Testing and Assessment Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Personality Traits and Psychology

Abstract

Two aspects of a previous article by Rice, Greenfield, Alexander, and Sternbach (1976)--their errors with regard to a previous article by Thorpe and Swartz, and their statement regarding sex differences on Holtzman Inkblot Technique variables--are described and discussed.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 0 citations exist upstream.

References

1962Inkblot Perception and Personality 1963Group method of administration for the Holtzman inkblot technique 1965Level of Perceptual Development as Reflected in Responses to the Holtzman Inkblot Technique 1973Holtzman Inkblot Technique 1974Threat of Shock, State Anxiety, and the Holtzman Inkblot Technique 1972The Holtzman inkblot technique : [a handbook for clinical application 1971Sex differences on the group version of the hit 1976Genetic Correlates and Sex Differences in Holtzman Inkblot Technique Responses of Twins

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.