SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Why serious academic fraud occurs in China
0 references·9 citing·26 second hop
Why serious academic fraud occurs in China (2012)Why serious academic fraud occurs in ChinaMetadata analysis of retracted fake papers in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology (2023)Metadata analysis of retracte…Fake paper identification in the pool of withdrawn and rejected manuscripts submitted to Naunyn–Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology (2023)Fake paper identification in …The Possibility of Systematic Research Fraud Targeting Under-Studied Human Genes: Causes, Consequences, and Potential Solutions (2019)The Possibility of Systematic…Can the Growth of Mega-Journals Affect Authors' Choice of Journal? (2017)Can the Growth of Mega-Journa…Addressing Reproducibility: Peer Review, Impact Factors, Checklists, Guidelines, and Reproducibility Initiatives (2017)Addressing Reproducibility: P…Chinese researchers, scholarly communication behaviour and trust (2016)Chinese researchers, scholarl…Why Edit a Journal? Academic Irony and Paradox (2015)Why Edit a Journal? Academic …Trash journals in China (2014)Trash journals in ChinaAn imbalanced journal publishing market (2014)An imbalanced journal publish…Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)Publishers withdraw more than 120 gibberish papers (2014)Publishing: The peer-review scam (2014)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Peer review: still king in the digital age (2014)Trust and Authority in Scholarly Communications in the Light of the Digital Transition: setting the scene for a major study (2014)Trustworthiness and authority of scholarly information in a digital age: Results of an international questionnaire (2015)Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research (2010)Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact (2012)The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing (2015)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)A scoping review on what constitutes a good research culture (2024)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013) (2015)The relationship and incidence of three editorial notices in PubPeer : Errata, expressions of concern, and retractions (2020)How to fight fake papers: a review on important information sources and steps towards solution of the problem (2024)Machine learning based screening of potential paper mill publications in cancer research: methodological and cross sectional study (2026)Publish or impoverish (2017)Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21 st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? (2020)The fight against fake-paper factories that churn out sham science (2021)Authors must follow the editorial guidelines on the use of large language models in review papers (2025)Understanding Open Knowledge in China: A Chinese Approach to Openness? (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2019The Possibility of Systematic Research Fraud Targeting Under-Studied Human Genes: Causes, Consequences, and Potential Solutions34 cited
  • 2023Metadata analysis of retracted fake papers in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology15 cited
  • 2023Fake paper identification in the pool of withdrawn and rejected manuscripts submitted to Naunyn–Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology15 cited
  • 2014Trash journals in China13 cited
  • 2017Addressing Reproducibility: Peer Review, Impact Factors, Checklists, Guidelines, and Reproducibility Initiatives11 cited
  • 2015Why Edit a Journal? Academic Irony and Paradox9 cited
  • 2017Can the Growth of Mega-Journals Affect Authors' Choice of Journal?8 cited
  • 2016Chinese researchers, scholarly communication behaviour and trust8 cited
  • 2014An imbalanced journal publishing market7 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work