Gendercide and genocide

Abstract

The most wide-ranging book ever published on gender-selective mass killing, or this collection of essays is also first to explore systematically targeting of non-combatant battle-age males in various wartime and peacetime contexts. Representing such fields as sociology, political science, psychology, queer studies, and human-rights activism, contributors explore themes and issues outlined by editor Adam Jones in book's opening essay. In that article, which provoked considerable debate when it was first published in 2000, Jones argues that throughout history and around world, population group most consistently targeted for mass killing and state-backed oppression are non-combatant men of roughly fifteen to fifty-five years of age. Such males, Jones contends, are typically seen as the group posing greatest danger to conquering force. Jones's article also examines use of institutions - such as female infanticide, witch-hunts, military conscription, and forced labor - against both women and men. The subsequent essays - some original, some drawn from a special issue of Journal of Genocide Research and other sources - expand, diversify, and criticize this framing of gendercide. They range from a sophisticated theoretical analysis of gendercide to in-depth treatments of such topics as Rwandan genocide of 1994, gendercidal oppression of young African American males, predicament of gays and lesbians in face of increasing biotechnological manipulation of human behavior, and psychology of shame and humiliation underlying generdercides against both sexes. Still other articles take issue with Jones's theories of gendercide, or explore how human-rights organizations have defined, documented, and responded to gendercide and other sex-specific atrocities. A closing essay considers relevance of feminist and men's studies literatures for study of gendercide.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 205 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.