SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Systematic Review
11 references·16 citing·38 second hop
Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Systematic Review (2014)Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Co…SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and e…Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews? – a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane review groups (2013)Can a core outcome set improv…Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012)Developing core outcome sets …Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)Guidance for Developers of He…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Avoidable Waste in the Production and Reporting of Research Evidence (2009)Avoidable Waste in the Produc…Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Avoidable waste in the produc…Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Systematic Review of the Empi…Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials (2007)Handsearching versus electron…The OMERACT-OARSI Core Domain Set for Measurement in Clinical Trials of Hip and/or Knee Osteoarthritis (2019)The OMERACT-OARSI Core Domain…Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 5th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research (2019)Choosing important health out…Higher number of items associated with significantly lower response rates in COS Delphi surveys (2018)Higher number of items associ…Toward Establishing Core Outcome Domains For Trials in Kidney Transplantation (2017)Toward Establishing Core Outc…Developing a Set of Core Outcomes for Trials in Hemodialysis: An International Delphi Survey (2017)Developing a Set of Core Outc…Core Outcome Sets (2017)Core Outcome SetsCore outcome sets in women's and newborn health: a systematic review (2017)Core outcome sets in women's …Comparison of Clinical Trial and Systematic Review Outcomes for the 4 Most Prevalent Eye Diseases (2017)Comparison of Clinical Trial …The use of qualitative methods to inform Delphi surveys in core outcome set development (2016)The use of qualitative method…Including patients in core outcome set development: issues to consider based on three workshops with around 100 international delegates (2016)Including patients in core ou…Core outcome sets and systematic reviews (2016)Core outcome sets and systema…Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey (2016)Choosing Important Health Out…The Importance of Integration of Stakeholder Views in Core Outcome Set Development: Otitis Media with Effusion in Children with Cleft Palate (2015)The Importance of Integration…Systematic reviews and meta-analysis (2015)Systematic reviews and meta-a…Development of a core outcome set for research and audit studies in reconstructive breast surgery (2015)Development of a core outcome…A Core Outcome Set for Evaluation of Interventions to Prevent Preterm Birth (2015)A Core Outcome Set for Evalua…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning (2017)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (2010)How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline (2016)The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument (2016)Guidelines for Inclusion of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trial Protocols (2018)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? (2008)Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa (2012)Systematic review automation technologies (2014)An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts (1963)Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0 (2014)Development of an International Standard Set of Value-Based Outcome Measures for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Report of the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) CKD Working Group (2018)Implementing core outcomes in kidney disease: report of the Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology (SONG) implementation workshop (2018)Recruiting and retaining participants in e-Delphi surveys for core outcome set development: Evaluating the COMiT'ID study (2018)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement (2013)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force (2013)A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) (2021)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)CONSORT Statement for Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatments: A 2017 Update and a CONSORT Extension for Nonpharmacologic Trial Abstracts (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
  • 2013SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials6,239 cited
  • 2009Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence2,204 cited
  • 2012Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider1,659 cited
  • 2008Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias1,544 cited
  • 2010Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines1,432 cited
  • 2009Avoidable Waste in the Production and Reporting of Research Evidence600 cited
  • 2007Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials247 cited
  • 2013Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews? – a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane review groups183 cited

Cited by

  • 2017Developing a Set of Core Outcomes for Trials in Hemodialysis: An International Delphi Survey307 cited
  • 2018Higher number of items associated with significantly lower response rates in COS Delphi surveys266 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2015A Core Outcome Set for Evaluation of Interventions to Prevent Preterm Birth212 cited
  • 2016Core outcome sets and systematic reviews205 cited
  • 2019The OMERACT-OARSI Core Domain Set for Measurement in Clinical Trials of Hip and/or Knee Osteoarthritis188 cited
  • 2016The use of qualitative methods to inform Delphi surveys in core outcome set development175 cited
  • 2017Core outcome sets in women's and newborn health: a systematic review166 cited
  • 2017Core Outcome Sets152 cited
  • 2016Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey151 cited
  • 2015Development of a core outcome set for research and audit studies in reconstructive breast surgery144 cited
  • 2019Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 5th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research144 cited
  • 2017Toward Establishing Core Outcome Domains For Trials in Kidney Transplantation139 cited
  • 2015The Importance of Integration of Stakeholder Views in Core Outcome Set Development: Otitis Media with Effusion in Children with Cleft Palate132 cited
  • 2016Including patients in core outcome set development: issues to consider based on three workshops with around 100 international delegates129 cited
  • 2015Systematic reviews and meta-analysis49 cited
  • 2017Comparison of Clinical Trial and Systematic Review Outcomes for the 4 Most Prevalent Eye Diseases41 cited