SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Quality of Methods Reporting in Parasitology Experiments
6 references·1 citing·33 second hop
The Quality of Methods Reporting in Parasitology Experiments (2014)The Quality of Methods Reporting in Paras…Ten Simple Rules for Reproducible Computational Research (2013)Ten Simple Rules for Reproduc…Bias in peer review (2012)Bias in peer reviewReproducible Science (2010)Reproducible ScienceThe PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…The explicit mentioning of reporting guidelines in urogynecology journals in 2013: A bibliometric study (2015)The explicit mentioning of re…Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network (2010)Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial (2011)Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa (2012)CONSORT and the internal validity of randomized controlled trials in Female Pelvic Medicine (2015)Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science (1988)Science as Social Knowledge (1990)A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (1994)Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance, Novelty, and Resource Allocation in Science (2016)Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Taverna: a tool for the composition and enactment of bioinformatics workflows (2004)Galaxy: A platform for interactive large-scale genome analysis (2005)Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences (2010)Reproducibility in Science (2014)Good enough practices in scientific computing. (2017)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Wonderful life: the Burgess Shale and the nature of history (1990)The black swan: the impact of the highly improbable (2007)On the scientific superiority of conceptual replications for scientific progress (2016)Reproducibility in Computational Neuroscience Models and Simulations (2016)Open science, communal culture, and women’s participation in the movement to improve science (2020)The New Statistics (2013)The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False4,702 cited
  • 2012Bias in peer review997 cited
  • 2013Ten Simple Rules for Reproducible Computational Research875 cited
  • 2010Reproducible Science124 cited

Cited by

  • 2015The explicit mentioning of reporting guidelines in urogynecology journals in 2013: A bibliometric study9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work