The economic burden of TB diagnosis and treatment in South Africa

Nicola Foster · Anna Vassall · Susan Cleary · Lucy Cunnama · Gavin Churchyard · Edina Sinanovic

163 citations0/0 files storedSocial Science & Medicine

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Healthcare Systems and Reforms Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare

Abstract

Social protection against the cost of illness is a central policy objective of Universal Health Coverage and the post-2015 Global strategy for Tuberculosis (TB). Understanding the economic burden associated with TB illness and care is key to identifying appropriate interventions towards achieving this target. The aims of this study were to identify points in patient pathways from start of TB symptoms to treatment completion where interventions could be targeted to reduce the economic impact on patients and households, and to identify those most vulnerable to these costs. Two cohorts of patients accessing TB services from ten clinics in four provinces in South Africa were surveyed between July 2012 and June 2013. One cohort of 351 people with suspected TB were interviewed at the point of receiving a TB diagnostic and followed up six months later. Another cohort of 168 patients on TB treatment, at the same ten facilities, was interviewed at two-months and five-months on treatment. Patients were asked about their health-seeking behaviour, associated costs, income loss, and coping strategies used. Patients incurred the greatest share of TB episode costs (41%) prior to starting treatment, with the largest portion of these costs being due to income loss. Poorer patients incurred higher direct costs during treatment than those who were less poor but only 5% of those interviewed were accessing cash-transfers during treatment. Indirect costs accounted for 52% of total episode cost. Despite free TB diagnosis and care in South Africa, patients incur substantial direct and indirect costs particularly prior to starting treatment. The poorest group of patients were incurring higher costs, with fewer resources to pay for it. Both the direct and indirect cost of illness should be taken into account when setting levels of financial protection and social support, to prevent TB illness from pushing the poor further into poverty.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 163 citations exist upstream.

References

2003Household catastrophic health expenditure: a multicountry analysis 1995The friction cost method for measuring indirect costs of disease 2014Economic Evaluation in Clinical Trials 2004THE ECONOMIC BURDEN OF ILLNESS FOR HOUSEHOLDS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: A REVIEW OF STUDIES FOCUSING ON MALARIA, TUBERCULOSIS, AND HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS/ACQUIRED IMMUNODEFICIENCY SYNDROME 2014Financial burden for tuberculosis patients in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review 2001Equity and health sector reforms: can low-income countries escape the medical poverty trap?2005Cost-of-illness analysis 2011Inequities in access to health care in South Africa

Cited by

2018Catastrophic costs of tuberculosis care: a mixed methods study from Puducherry, India 2019Patient costs of hypertension care in public health care facilities in Kenya 2017The patient costs of care for those with TB and HIV: a cross-sectional study from South Africa 2019Risk factors for catastrophic costs associated with tuberculosis in rural South Africa 2020Financial burden of HIV and TB among patients in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional survey

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.