SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Health technology assessment and priority setting for health policy in Sweden
1 references·4 citing·20 second hop
Health technology assessment and priority setting for health policy in Sweden (2004)Health technology assessment and priority…Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ (1996)Guidelines for authors and pe…A model for priority setting of health technology assessment: the experience of AHP-TOPSIS combination approach (2016)A model for priority setting …Public funding of new cancer drugs: Is NICE getting nastier? (2009)Public funding of new cancer …Emerging health technologies: Informing and supporting health policy early (2008)Emerging health technologies:…Selection of new health technologies for assessment aimed at informing decision making: A survey among horizon scanning systems (2006)Selection of new health techn…Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes (1987)Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials (1996)Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes (2005)Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases (2006)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement (2013)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) Statement: Updated Reporting Guidance for Health Economic Evaluations (2022)The Dynamics of Technological Change in Medicine (1994)'Early warning systems' for identifying new healthcare technologies. (1999)Priority setting for new technologies in medicine: qualitative case study (2000)Evidence-based public policy making for medicines across countries: findings and implications for the future (2021)National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments (2004)European Perspective on the Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of Cancer Therapies (2007)Health systems in transition. (2010)A systematic review of coverage decision-making on health technologies—Evidence from the real world (2012)Decision making by NICE: examining the influences of evidence, process and context (2013)Priority-setting decisions for new cancer drugs: a qualitative case study (2001)Ten years of marketing approvals of anticancer drugs in Europe: regulatory policy and guidance documents need to find a balance between different pressures (2005)A QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO CONTENT VALIDITY1 (1975)Patient-based health technology assessment: A vision of the future (2007)Priority setting for health technology assessments: A systematic review of current practical approaches (2007)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1996Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ1,821 cited

Cited by

  • 2009Public funding of new cancer drugs: Is NICE getting nastier?68 cited
  • 2006Selection of new health technologies for assessment aimed at informing decision making: A survey among horizon scanning systems60 cited
  • 2008Emerging health technologies: Informing and supporting health policy early58 cited
  • 2016A model for priority setting of health technology assessment: the experience of AHP-TOPSIS combination approach39 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work