SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The examination and identification of bite marks in foods using 3D scanning and 3D comparison methods
3 references·10 citing·39 second hop
The examination and identification of bite marks in foods using 3D scanning and 3D comparison methods (2011)The examination and identification of bit…The barriers to achieving an evidence base for bitemark analysis (2006)The barriers to achieving an …3-D imaging and quantitative comparison of human dentitions and simulated bite marks (2006)3-D imaging and quantitative …A forensic classification of distortion in human bite marks (2001)A forensic classification of …A systematic review of 3D scanners and computer assisted analyzes of bite marks: searching for improved analysis methods during the Covid-19 pandemic (2021)A systematic review of 3D sca…Three-dimensional analysis of bitemarks: A validation study using an intraoral scanner (2020)Three-dimensional analysis of…Reconstruction and physical fit analysis of fragmented skeletal remains using 3D imaging and printing (2020)Reconstruction and physical f…Tri-dimensional pattern analysis of foodstuff bitemarks — A pilot study of tomographic database (2018)Tri-dimensional pattern analy…CT-scan vs . 3D surface scanning of a skull: first considerations regarding reproducibility issues (2017)CT-scan vs . 3D surface scann…Application of 3D models of palatal rugae to personal identification: hints at identification from 3D-3D superimposition techniques (2017)Application of 3D models of p…Three-dimensional validation of the impact of the quantity of teeth or tooth parts on the morphological difference between twin dentitions. (2016)Three-dimensional validation …The role of the Forensic Odontologist in Disaster Victim Identification: A Brief Review (2014)The role of the Forensic Odon…A quantitative method for comparing human dentition with tooth marks using three-dimensional technology and geometric morphometric analysis (2013)A quantitative method for com…A comparative study of overlay generation methods in bite mark analysis (2013)A comparative study of overla…BITE MARKS IN FORENSIC DENTISTRY: A REVIEW OF LEGAL, SCIENTIFIC ISSUES (1995)Accuracy of Bite Mark Overlays: A Comparison of Five Common Methods to Produce Exemplars from a Suspect's Dentition (1998)Dental anomalies and their value in human identification: a case report. (2010)A Comparison Between Manual and Computerized Bite-Mark Analysis (2013)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)A look at forensic dentistry – Part 1: The role of teeth in the determination of human identity (2001)A look at forensic dentistry – Part 2: Teeth as weapons of violence – identification of bitemark perpetrators (2001)Biomechanical Factors in Human Dermal Bitemarks in a Cadaver Model* (2008)Reliability of a two-dimensional footprint measurement approach (2010)The scientific basis for human bitemark analyses – a critical review (2001)Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward (2009)The application of traditional and geometric morphometric analyses for forensic quantification of sexual dimorphism: preliminary investigations in a Western Australian population (2012)Evaluation of Bitemark Analysis’s Potential Application in Forensic Identification: A Systematic Review (2024)Digital forensic osteology—Possibilities in cooperation with the Virtopsy® project (2007)Estimation of sex and age of “virtual skeletons”–a feasibility study (2008)Accuracy and reliability of measurements obtained from computed tomography 3D volume rendered images (2014)Effective approaches to three-dimensional digital reconstruction of fragmented human skeletal remains using laser surface scanning (2020)Virtual anthropology: a preliminary test of macroscopic observation versus 3D surface scans and computed tomography (CT) scans (2020)Virtual anthropology? Reliability of three-dimensional photogrammetry as a forensic anthropology measurement and documentation technique (2020)Computerized recording of the palatal rugae pattern and an evaluation of its application in forensic identification. (2004)Analysis of rugae in burn victims and cadavers to simulate rugae identification in cases of incineration and decomposition. (2005)Importance of palatal rugae in individual identification (2009)Three-dimensional analysis of sphenoid sinus uniqueness for assessing personal identification: a novel method based on 3D-3D superimposition (2019)Automated Identification from Dental Data (AutoIDD): A new development in digital forensics (2020)Three-dimensional superimposition of digital models for individual identification (2020)The uniqueness of the human dentition as forensic evidence: a systematic review on the technological methodology (2014)3D dental images in forensic odontology: A scoping review of superimposition approaches utilizing 3D imaging (2024)A new approach for sex prediction by evaluating mandibular arch and canine dimensions with machine-learning classifiers and intraoral scanners (a retrospective study) (2024)Evaluation of anthropometric accuracy and reliability using different three-dimensional scanning systems (2010)Variation in the Measurement of Cranial Volume and Surface Area Using 3D Laser Scanning Technology (2010)Virtual Determination of Sex: Metric and Nonmetric Traits of the Adult Pelvis from 3D Computed Tomography Models*,† (2011)The big puzzle: A critical review of virtual re-association methods for fragmented human remains in a DVI context' (2021)A multi-method assessment of 3D printed micromorphological osteological features (2022)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The pandemic paradox: The consequences of COVID‐19 on domestic violence (2020)Digital intraoral and radiologic records in forensic identification: Match with disruptive technology (2024)Forensic Odontology in the Digital Era: A Narrative Review of Current Methods and Emerging Trends (2025)Does contextual information bias bitemark comparisons? (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 20063-D imaging and quantitative comparison of human dentitions and simulated bite marks90 cited
  • 2001A forensic classification of distortion in human bite marks87 cited
  • 2006The barriers to achieving an evidence base for bitemark analysis81 cited

Cited by

  • 2017Application of 3D models of palatal rugae to personal identification: hints at identification from 3D-3D superimposition techniques59 cited
  • 2017CT-scan vs . 3D surface scanning of a skull: first considerations regarding reproducibility issues43 cited
  • 2020Three-dimensional analysis of bitemarks: A validation study using an intraoral scanner23 cited
  • 2021A systematic review of 3D scanners and computer assisted analyzes of bite marks: searching for improved analysis methods during the Covid-19 pandemic22 cited
  • 2020Reconstruction and physical fit analysis of fragmented skeletal remains using 3D imaging and printing21 cited
  • 2013A quantitative method for comparing human dentition with tooth marks using three-dimensional technology and geometric morphometric analysis19 cited
  • 2013A comparative study of overlay generation methods in bite mark analysis15 cited
  • 2016Three-dimensional validation of the impact of the quantity of teeth or tooth parts on the morphological difference between twin dentitions.12 cited
  • 2018Tri-dimensional pattern analysis of foodstuff bitemarks — A pilot study of tomographic database12 cited
  • 2014The role of the Forensic Odontologist in Disaster Victim Identification: A Brief Review

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

10 cited