Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Rapid Communication: How to train your Bayesian: A problem-representation transfer rather than a format-representation shift explains training effects

10 references·9 citing·44 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1995How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats.2,131 cited
1996Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty1,295 cited
2003Learning and transfer: A general role for analogical encoding.866 cited
2007Base-rate respect: From ecological rationality to dual processes410 cited
2003Frequency illusions and other fallacies266 cited
2001Solving probabilistic and statistical problems: a matter of information structure and question form224 cited
2013Ecological rationality or nested sets? Individual differences in cognitive processing predict Bayesian reasoning78 cited
2008Frequency interpretation of ambiguous statistical information facilitates Bayesian reasoning57 cited
2012Evolutionary modules and Bayesian facilitation: The role of general cognitive resources52 cited
2013The effect of iconicity of visual displays on statistical reasoning: evidence in favor of the null hypothesis45 cited

Cited by

2019Concept characteristics and variation in lexical diversity in two Dutch dialect areas30 cited
2015Now you Bayes, now you don’t: effects of set-problem and frequency-format mental representations on statistical reasoning25 cited
2017Another chance for good reasoning12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2020

What facilitates Bayesian reasoning? A crucial test of ecological rationality versus nested sets hypotheses

11 cited

2020Which cognitive individual differences predict good Bayesian reasoning? Concurrent comparisons of underlying abilities10 cited

2021Perspectives on the 2 × 2 Matrix: Solving Semantically Distinct Problems Based on a Shared Structure of Binary Contingencies5 cited

2019Mental Simulation as a Remedy for Biased Reasoning5 cited

2015Beyond getting the numbers right: what does it mean to be a “successful” Bayesian reasoner?4 cited

2024When intuitive Bayesians need to be good readers: The problem-wording effect on Bayesian reasoning3 cited