SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Frequency of Treatment-Effect Modification Affecting Indirect Comparisons
16 references·0 citing·32 second hop
Frequency of Treatment-Effect Modification Affecting Indirect Comparisons (2010)Frequency of Treatment-Effect Modificatio…Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviews (2009)Methodological problems in th…Use of Indirect and Mixed Treatment Comparisons for Technology Assessment (2008)Use of Indirect and Mixed Tre…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…What is heterogeneity and is it important? (2007)What is heterogeneity and is …Indirect comparisons of competing interventions (2005)Indirect comparisons of compe…Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses (2003)Validity of indirect comparis…Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Quantifying heterogeneity in …Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta‐analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes (2002)Issues in the selection of a …Heterogeneity and statistical significance in meta-analysis: an empirical study of 125 meta-analyses (2000)Heterogeneity and statistical…Detecting and describing heterogeneity in meta-analysis (1998)Detecting and describing hete…The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (1997)The results of direct and ind…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. D…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of BiasReview papers : The statistical basis of meta-analysis (1993)Review papers : The statistic…A comparison of statistical methods for combining event rates from clinical trials (1989)A comparison of statistical m…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Meta-analysis in clinical tri…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Affective Disorders and Suicide Risk: A Reexamination (2000)Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines (2002)The prevalence of depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbances in COVID‐19 patients: a meta‐analysis (2020)How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? (2002)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Integration of evidence from multiple meta-analyses: a primer on umbrella reviews, treatment networks and multiple treatments meta-analyses (2009)Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program (2011)Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 4 (2013)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness (2011)Indirect and mixed‐treatment comparison, network, or multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool (2012)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Assessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment Comparisons (2006)Evaluation of networks of randomized trials (2007)Interpreting Indirect Treatment Comparisons and Network Meta-Analysis for Health-Care Decision Making: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 1 (2011)A refined method for the meta‐analysis of controlled clinical trials with binary outcome (2001)Statistical heterogeneity in systematic reviews of clinical trials: a critical appraisal of guidelines and practice (2002)Sex Differences in Insomnia: A Meta-Analysis (2006)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1986Meta-analysis in clinical trials39,515 cited
  • 2002Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis36,730 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
  • 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
  • 1997The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials2,052 cited
  • 1993Review papers : The statistical basis of meta-analysis1,284 cited
  • 2003Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses944 cited
  • 1998Detecting and describing heterogeneity in meta-analysis728 cited
  • 2005Indirect comparisons of competing interventions680 cited
  • 2002Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta‐analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes660 cited
  • 2007What is heterogeneity and is it important?550 cited
  • 1989A comparison of statistical methods for combining event rates from clinical trials420 cited
  • 2009Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviews395 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2000Heterogeneity and statistical significance in meta-analysis: an empirical study of 125 meta-analyses370 cited
  • 2008Use of Indirect and Mixed Treatment Comparisons for Technology Assessment355 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.