Theorising Corporate Social Responsibility as an Essentially Contested Concept: Is a Definition Necessary?Adaeze Okoye2009-01-07articleJournal of Business Ethics399 citationsclosedNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Corporate Social Responsibility ReportingEthics in Business and EducationCorporate Social Responsibility and SustainabilityAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 399 citations exist upstream.References2010Strategic management a stakeholder approach2007The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits1979A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance1995The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications2001Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective1974Power: A Radical View1999Corporate Social Responsibility2003Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by BusinessCited by2015Stakeholder Theory Classification: A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation of Definitions2010The Meaning of Corporate Social Responsibility: The Vision of Four Nations2015CSR-Washing is Rare: A Conceptual Framework, Literature Review, and Critique2020Reflections on the 2018 Decade Award: The Meaning and Dynamics of Corporate Social Responsibility2016Zeitgeist or chameleon? A quantitative analysis of CSR definitions2015How Does It Fit? Exploring the Congruence Between Organizations and Their Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Activities2014Corporate Social Responsibility in Challenging and Non-Enabling Institutional Contexts: Do Institutional Voids Matter?2011Stakeholder: Essentially Contested or Just Confused?