SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Making Sense of Meta-Analysis: A Critique of “Effectiveness of Long-Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy”
16 references·3 citing·33 second hop
Making Sense of Meta-Analysis: A Critique of “Effectiveness of Long-Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy” (2010)Making Sense of Meta-Analysis: A Critique…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (2008)Systematic Reviews and Meta-A…Study Quality Assessment in Systematic Reviews of Research on Intervention Effects (2008)Study Quality Assessment in S…Effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: a meta-analysis. (2008)Effectiveness of long-term ps…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions (2007)Grey literature in meta-analy…Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Development of AMSTAR: a meas…Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)Publication Bias in Meta‐Anal…Failsafe N or File‐Drawer Number (2005)Failsafe N or File‐Drawer Num…Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Assessing the quality of cont…Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Practical Meta-AnalysisMeta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Meta-analysis of Observationa…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-…Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Meta-analysis and the science…Dealing with clinical heterogeneity in meta‐analysis. Assumptions, methods, interpretation (2013)Dealing with clinical heterog…50 Years and the Future of Agency-Based Clinical Social Work Practice: Introduction to the Special Issue (2012)50 Years and the Future of Ag…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Book Reviews: Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis Larry V. Hedges and Ingram Olkin New York: Academic Press, 1985. xxii + 369 pp (1988)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Review of Educational Research. (1924)The study of teaching (1974)Response Effects in Surveys: A Review and Synthesis. (1976)Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review (2003)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Handbook of research on teaching (1986)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS) (2016)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The Impact of Enhancing Students’ Social and Emotional Learning: A Meta-Analysis of School-Based Universal Interventions (2011)Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement84,364 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement65,829 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.48,853 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,084 cited
  • 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
  • 2000Practical Meta-Analysis9,196 cited
  • 1976Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research5,330 cited
  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
  • 2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
  • 2005Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis2,374 cited
  • 2008Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis1,293 cited
  • 2008Effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: a meta-analysis.736 cited
  • 2007Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions600 cited
  • 2005

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Failsafe N or File‐Drawer Number
179 cited
  • 2008Study Quality Assessment in Systematic Reviews of Research on Intervention Effects99 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2018Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis1,714 cited
    • 2013Dealing with clinical heterogeneity in meta‐analysis. Assumptions, methods, interpretation100 cited
    • 201250 Years and the Future of Agency-Based Clinical Social Work Practice: Introduction to the Special Issue3 cited