Responsible Conduct of Research Training and Trust Between Research Postgraduate Students and Supervisors

Sara R. Jordan · Phillip W. Gray

11 citations0/0 files storedEthics & Behavior

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Academic integrity and plagiarism Ethics in Business and Education Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions

Abstract

Does responsible conduct of research (RCR) training improve levels of trust between researchers? Using data gathered as part of a survey on the attitudes of master's and doctoral-level students toward RCR, we found that RCR training correlated with a weakened beliefs of students toward their supervisors' ethicality but a stronger belief in the ethicality of their peers. We believe that these findings point to new avenues of research on trust in the academic setting and to needs for curriculum changes in RCR training.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 11 citations exist upstream.

References

2009Responsible Conduct of Research 2001The Responsible Conduct of Research 2023Journal of Research Administration 2008Against the ethicists: on the evils of ethical regulation 2007The History, Purpose, and Future of Instruction in the Responsible Conduct of Research 2002Six domains of research ethics 2010Evaluating the Effects That Existing Instruction on Responsible Conduct of Research Has on Ethical Decision Making 1998COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, ENGINEERING, AND PUBLIC POLICY

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.