Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

IDEOLOGICAL POSITION AS A VARIABLE IN THE AUTHORING OF DISSENTING OPINIONS ON THE WARREN AND BURGER COURTS

10 references·5 citing·32 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2005Supreme Court Decision Making455 cited
1965Elements of Judicial Strategy350 cited
1966Elements of Judicial Strategy205 cited
1972The Federal Courts as a Political System.83 cited
2011Judicial Decision Making80 cited
1972Policy Goals, Strategic, Choice and Majority Opinion Assignments in the U. S. Supreme Court75 cited
1961Quantitative Analysis of Judicial Behavior59 cited
1979Who Speaks for the Court? Majority Opinion Assignment from Taft to Burger51 cited
1986Issue Specialization in Majority Opinion Assignment On the Burger Court49 cited
1988Majority Opinion Assignments and the Maintenance of the Original Coalition on the Warren Court36 cited

Cited by

2014Gender, Race, and Dissensus on State Supreme Courts*24 cited
2015The political determinants of judicial dissent: evidence from the Chilean Constitutional Tribunal23 cited
2006Disagreement on the Rehnquist Court13 cited
2012Judicial Ideal Points in New Democracies: The Case of Taiwan11 cited
2015Judicial review and political partisanship: Moving from consensual to majoritarian democracy11 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work