The cultural contradictions of managing change: using horizon scanning in an evidence‐based policy context

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this article is to identify points of conceptual conflict between evidence‐based policy research and horizon (environmental) scanning. Design/methodology/approach The paper begins with a brief history of foresight in UK government, then describes the current government context for horizon scanning. Next, it defines horizon scanning as a method; highlights the contradictions between horizon scanning and more traditional empirical research; and offers suggestions to improve the rigor of horizon scanning. Findings Increased focus on defining the rules for source identification and scan data validation can enhance credibility. Research limitations/implications Current horizon scanning work in the UK government suggests these methodological improvements, but proof will wait upon completion and deployment of several ongoing horizon scans. Practical implications Provides improved acceptability and dissemination of horizon scanning as a tool, as well as heightened engagement of policy‐makers, planners, and leaders with horizon scanning output. Originality/value There has been little previous work exploring the cultural constraints on adoption of horizon scanning within the evidence‐based polity context.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 71 citations exist upstream.